Names/K

Kim

girls’ name · 84%boys’ name · 16%FadedCompare

Kim is outside the top 1,000 in 2024, with 28 births. Its best rank was 34th, in 1960.

Rank in 2024
outside the top 1,000
Births in 2024
280.00% of girls
Peak year
196012,474 births
Best rank
#34in 1960
Since 1914
214,725people given the name
Babies named Kim, by year of birthgirlsboys
05k10k15k20k18801900192019401960198020002020

The story in the numbers

179,781 girls have been named Kim in the United States since 1914, according to Social Security records. The busiest single year was 1960, with 12,474 births — 0.62% of all girls recorded that year.

The name has all but left use: 28 births in 2024, against 12,474 at the peak.

Half of everyone given the name was born by 1962, and the 1960s alone account for 53%. It has spent 48 of 145 years in the top 1,000, 16 of them in the top 100.

Kim is used for both sexes: 16% of its bearers are boys (34,944), most of them born around 1955.

Rank among girls, year by year

Higher on the chart = more popularrank (gaps = outside the top 1,000)
#1#250#500#750#100018801900192019401960198020002020

By decade

Decadegirls named Kim
1910s5
1920s57
1930s209
1940s1,284
1950s56,081
1960s94,386
1970s20,697
1980s3,816
1990s1,600
2000s875
2010s587
2020s184

In 1960, its biggest year

Kim was the 34th most given girl’s name that year. The top five girls’ names of 1960 were Mary, Susan, Linda, Karen and Donna. See all of 1960.

Names that rose and fell with Kim

Same sex, most similar popularity curve over 145 years, in five-year steps — the shape of the line, not the size.

Other spellings in the data

What this page does not tell you. The Social Security data records how many babies were given a name, not what the name means or where it comes from — so neither do we. Counts cover people with a Social Security number; names given to fewer than five babies in a year are withheld. More on the data.