Jonna
Jonna is absent from the 2024 data, which means fewer than five births. Its best rank was 624th, in 1963.
- Rank in 2024
- —fewer than 5 births
- Births in 2024
- 0not in the data
- Peak year
- 1963261 births
- Best rank
- #624in 1963
- Since 1928
- 5,551people given the name
The story in the numbers
5,551 girls have been named Jonna in the United States since 1928, according to Social Security records. The busiest single year was 1963, with 261 births.
The name has all but left use: none recorded in 2024, against 261 at the peak.
Half of everyone given the name was born by 1973, and the 1960s alone account for 26%. It has spent 10 of 145 years in the top 1,000.
Rank among girls, year by year
By decade
| Decade | girls named Jonna | |
|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 10 | |
| 1930s | 49 | |
| 1940s | 304 | |
| 1950s | 528 | |
| 1960s | 1,450 | |
| 1970s | 1,053 | |
| 1980s | 894 | |
| 1990s | 656 | |
| 2000s | 381 | |
| 2010s | 188 | |
| 2020s | 38 |
In 1963, its biggest year
Jonna was the 624th most given girl’s name that year. The top five girls’ names of 1963 were Lisa, Mary, Susan, Karen and Linda. See all of 1963.
Names that rose and fell with Jonna
Same sex, most similar popularity curve over 145 years, in five-year steps — the shape of the line, not the size.
- Johnapeak 1963
- Leannepeak 1969
- Renaepeak 1970
- Deidrepeak 1963
- Leannpeak 1963
- Deeannapeak 1969
- Kendapeak 1964
- Johnnapeak 1963
Other spellings in the data
What this page does not tell you. The Social Security data records how many babies were given a name, not what the name means or where it comes from — so neither do we. Counts cover people with a Social Security number; names given to fewer than five babies in a year are withheld. More on the data.